News, entertainment, opinion, and whatever sparks interest in Burbank the Media City

City releases statement on controversial Burbank Recycle Center

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Photo: FLLewis/Media City G -- Burbank Recycle Center 500 South Flower Street Burbank

Photo: FLLewis/Media City G -- Burbank Recycle Center 500 South Flower Street Burbank

Lately, the Burbank City Council has been peppered with tough questions from residents about the status and alleged mismanagement of the Burbank Recycle Center over on South Flower Street. This is not the first time rumors have been flying about something “not right” going on at the center.

Yesterday, the City of Burbank put out a statement about the center and its involvement in the operation.

City of Burbank seal

City Statement on Burbank Recycle Center

BURBANK, Calif. (August 22, 2011) – On January 29, 2010, the State of California denied the City’s Application for Renewal of its Curbside Registration (Application), which allows the City to receive revenue from the State’s beverage containers recycling fund (CRV Fund).  The State denied the City’s Application because it accused the operator of the City’s Recycle Center, Burbank Recycling, Inc. (BRI) and Geoff Folsom, of failing to comply with State law and regulations dealing with the recycling of beverage containers at another recycling facility.  A hearing on the accusation against Mr. Folsom is still pending.

The City appealed the State’s denial of its Application because we believed that the City had acted fairly by waiting for the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to provide a hearing on the allegations to BRI.  It needs to be emphasized that the City has not been accused of any wrongdoing by the State.  The reason the City’s curbside certification was denied was simply because it uses BRI to operate the Recycle Center and to process the curbside materials.

The appeal hearing was held on March 29 and 30, 2011 and on May 13, 2011 the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) affirmed the denial of the City’s Application on the basis that Mr. Folsom had failed to comply with the State law and regulations. The ALJ did not find any wrongdoing on the part of the City of Burbank and found that the City had acted reasonably in waiting for CalRecycle to provide a hearing to Mr. Folsom. CalRecycle adopted the ALJ’s decision as its final decision on May 24, 2011. On June 7, the City Council decided not to appeal the decision.  The decision took effect on June 25, 2011.

While the denial of the curbside registration affects the City’s ability to collect CRV revenues, which totaled $20,432.23 in fiscal year 2010/11, it does not affect the City’s ability to continue operating its highly effective curbside recycling program that diverts about 40 tons per day of material from landfill disposal.  This program is part of the City’s comprehensive source reduction and recycling efforts to reduce land filling by at least 50 percent as required by Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939), which became law in 1989, and the City’s sustainability efforts to reach zero waste by 2040.  BRI is continuing to operate the Recycle Center on an interim basis while the City pursues its options.  The City of Burbank is committed to delivering excellent, uninterrupted curbside recycling services while an operational transition is completed at the Burbank Recycle Center. Residents and businesses should continue to place their recyclables in the proper carts and bins for collection and processing.

###

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to City releases statement on controversial Burbank Recycle Center

  1. Resident Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 2:10 pm #

    Let me get this all straight. The value of copper, aluminum and other metals are all so high now that people dress up in hard hats and go out to steal it but at the same time a city wide recycle system that collects from every addres every week only makes 20,432.23 a year for the same metals, cardboard and paper ? Now we make nothing ? Who has been getting all the money and who gets the money now ? This really defies logic and maybe we should hire the hard hat thieves to run this center, they certainly seem to understand the value of these materials.

  2. DixieFlyer Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 5:40 pm #

    Thanks, Miss Fronnie!!

    Thanks to you, we have a chance to compare the “Official Poop” from the Polyester Prince with the words as “reported” by the Burbank Follower.

    Curiously,the same “reporter” was unable to generate a news item on this subject until the “official poop” was “issued”.

Comments are closed.